🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.